Mini-Z, Kyosho Mini-Z Racer, MR-03, MR-02, MA-010, Forums, News, Pictures, Parts, and Shop -
Forums, Mini-Z, MiniZ, Kyosho Mini-Z, Kyosho MiniZ, Kyosho Mini-Z Racer
Mini-Z Hop-Ups, Mini-Z Parts, MiniZ Hop-Ups, MiniZ Parts, Kyosho Mini-Z Hop-Ups, Kyosho Mini-Z Parts, Kyosho MiniZ Hop-Ups, Kyosho MiniZ Parts, Kyosho Mini-Z Racer Hop-Ups, Racer Kyosho Mini-Z Parts
Old 2012.09.14, 07:26 AM   #1
arch2b's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 32,984
Send a message via AIM to arch2b
Giro-Z Bridge Requirements

i'm trying to narrow down some reliability issues and want to confirm bridge construction and configuration details.

i've constructed my bridge with a 2"x2" channel and determined the appropriate height so as not to encounter ghost lap counts from adjacent lanes.

what is the optimal spacing of the sensors in the bridge? i made mine equidistant from each other along the length of the bridge which ends up at 10.25-10.5" apart.
arch2b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012.09.14, 09:23 AM   #2
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 41
The correct measures are:

22cm btw each sensor/receiver.
45cm from track.
mikimotor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012.09.14, 10:13 AM   #3
arch2b's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 32,984
Send a message via AIM to arch2b
Originally Posted by mikimotor View Post
The correct measures are:

22cm btw each sensor/receiver.
45cm from track.
are these hard numbers or is there room for variation? i have had many recommendations and all have been less than 17" with the average at 14"

for those of us with english measurements:

8.6" btw each sensor/receiver
this leaves plenty of dead space at either end of the bridge which i assume is used to limit the pick up zone and adjacent lanes of traffic. does deviating from 8.6" sensor spacing affect reliability? it maybe that my height and spacing is creating the desired pickup field and affecting pick up zones within the field? i can only guess that the shorted spacing creates more overlap in the individual zones.

17.7" from track
equally interesting as this would create a pick up field that would easily encompass adjacent lanes of traffic. I suspect the shortened distance between sensors narrows the pick up field on the sides to correct for this, is that correct? i had set my sensor height at 16" so that measured pick up field did not capture adjacent lanes of traffic with a sensor spacing that was equidistant from each other given the total length of the bridge. to follow up on this, does the change in height affect reliability as it would seem that height can be used to calibrate the pick up field as well as sensor spacing?
arch2b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012.09.14, 03:01 PM   #4
arch2b's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 32,984
Send a message via AIM to arch2b
double checked the Giro-Z manual and the instructions in the manual (page 4) state the following;

26cm or 10.2" btw each sensor/receiver
this matches what i have done on my bridge. is the direction in the manual incorrect?
arch2b is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Giro-Z Bridge arch2b Lap Timing Systems and Software 39 2015.05.29 03:57 PM
New RCP Bridge RCPMini-z Tracks and GTGs 2 2010.03.10 07:52 PM
RCP Track New Piece Suggestions RCPMini-z Race Tracks, Track Layouts, Track Accessories 21 2009.10.04 03:45 AM
Giro Z Questions Spoon Miscellaneous Discussion 5 2007.01.22 01:20 AM
RCP Bridge 2005 RCPMini-z Tracks and GTGs 13 2005.08.16 10:26 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011
Mini Inferno Sale - Up to $85 Instant Savings!
Micro-T Hop-Ups
RC18R, M18, Micro RS4, Mini-LST, TamTech-Gear, Minizilla, RC18T, RC18B, RC18MT Products

Tiny RC Community News
[03/22/17] MZR was on vacation, didn't... : All kidding aside, the host experienced a bit of a server meltdown last week and efforts to restore the site to a new server took longer than anticipated. The current server is temporary until - more»
[11/25/15] Did You Hear? Our Black... : Hey Racers,
We're getting started a bit early with our Black Friday sale this year.  Generally we're not supporters of retailers opening early on Thanksgiving, but in our case, we're - more»
[06/30/15] Have You... : Hey All! Just a quick reminder to everyone that we post all of our Newletters here on the MZR Forum. If for some reason you miss them in your email inbox, you can always see the - more»
Mini-Z, Mini-Z Racer, MR-02, MA-010
M18, M18T, RC18T, Mini-LST, Mini-T, Micro RS4, XRay, 1/18, 18th scale
XMODS, XMOD, Micro Flight, ZipZaps, ZipZaps SE, Bit Char-G, MicroSizers, TTTT, Plantraco Desktop Rover, SuperSlicks, Digi Q
Mini Inferno, Mini Inferno ST, half EIGHT, 1/16, 16th scale
Epoch, Indoor Racer, 1/43, 43rd scale
E-Savage, eSavage, eZilla, e-Zilla, HPI
Robots, Bots, Bipeds, Wheeled, Manoi, Roomba, NXT, Lego, Hacking
Crawling, Crawlers, Micro, RC, Losi Mini-Rock Crawler, Duratrax Cliff Climber
Kyosho Minium, Caliber 120, Minium Forums
Mini-Z Hop-Ups, Mini-Z Parts, Mini Inferno Hop-Ups, Mini Inferno Parts, M18 Hop-Ups, M18 Parts