2006.01.28, 10:08 AM
|
#1
|
EMUracing
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,417
|
Mini-Z body compatability chart, now with offsets
The AtomicMods body compatability chart now has the offsets.
http://www.atomicmods.com/custom.aspx?id=40
If anybody sees any wrong data in the chart, post the correct info in this thread.
Last edited by byebye; 2006.04.06 at 11:06 AM.
|
|
|
2006.01.28, 04:15 PM
|
#2
|
DCGTG FET Guy
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 3,444
|
No wrong data, but you can get an NSX body to fit by laying down the crystal. I think the same is true for the Corvette C5R (one of my favorites).
|
|
|
2006.01.28, 04:37 PM
|
#3
|
Rockin Da Z
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NL, Canada
Posts: 3,112
|
The vette can be fit with a little modding?? Damn, I didn't know that. I am going to have a try at fitting it when I get back home tonight.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
||| There comes a time in every hobbist's life when they are forced to remorgage their house. |||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
2006.01.29, 01:46 AM
|
#4
|
MINI-Z MONSTER GARAGE
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 1,761
|
One correction...
#MZB60 Ferrari 575 GTC is 94mm RM as listed in the settings but in the chassis type columns it it listed as for the MR02MM which is incorrect, it should be in the previous column for MR02RM
__________________
I can't be in trouble again! I'm still in trouble from last time...
MR02RM, MR02MM, MZM,
Pro-Pulse Pro T-100 1/18 4X4,
Associated Team Factory RC18B with MAMBA 56K
DogBreath's Magical Mystery Album
|
|
|
2006.01.29, 07:03 AM
|
#5
|
EMUracing
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,417
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DogbreathRacing
One correction...
#MZB60 Ferrari 575 GTC is 94mm RM as listed in the settings but in the chassis type columns it it listed as for the MR02MM which is incorrect, it should be in the previous column for MR02RM
|
Good catch For the white body it is listed as MM and for the standard bodies it is listed as RM.
This is the official list, so it will only list bodies that fit AWD without modification as stated by Kyosho
|
|
|
2006.01.29, 08:59 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brooklyn. Got a problem with that?
Posts: 1,498
|
EMU,
The list doesn't come up
can you please send me the file again? The one you've sent before is on the work computer)
|
|
|
2006.03.09, 09:52 AM
|
#7
|
DCGTG FET Guy
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 3,444
|
I found something inconsistent in the chart.
The 360 GTC Red and Yellow have two different wheel listings. The red is 1N/1W and the yellow is 1N/1N.
By the way, who created the chart? I put it in my sig (so I can reference it quickly) and I want to give credit where credit is due.
-Spoon
Last edited by Spoon; 2006.03.09 at 09:59 AM.
|
|
|
2006.03.09, 11:34 AM
|
#8
|
EMUracing
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,417
|
Thanks for the info. I will revise the chart and send it to Atomicmods Sometimes those little things slip right by when working on a large chart.
I used alot of the information that Atomicmods had already, and added offsets and revised the layout to make it easier to understand for most users. I also added all the white/unpainted bodies.
The personal chart that I made for myself only has one place for each body style (1 NSX rather than 4), one 360... one Supra... Since they all have the same offsets, there is no reason to have 3 or 4 of the same body. It makes the chart much smaller, I also do not have the part numbers in my personal version. If the body is compatable with the AWD, it will have the offset for the AWD in the column. If there are no offsets or ??? then the body is not compatable with the particular chassis.
Last edited by EMU; 2006.03.09 at 11:57 AM.
|
|
|
2006.03.09, 08:10 PM
|
#9
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,198
|
Great job EMU! I reference your Wheel Chart often. It's very helpful.
I like your personal chart much better as it's easier to find bodies and their MR-02 offsets easier (e.g. the Ferrari 360 is only in one place and you easily see what the MR-02 offset is).
-hobbycar
Last edited by hobbycar; 2006.03.09 at 08:14 PM.
|
|
|
2006.03.09, 10:25 PM
|
#10
|
EMUracing
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,417
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hobbycar
Great job EMU! I reference your Wheel Chart often. It's very helpful.
I like your personal chart much better as it's easier to find bodies and their MR-02 offsets easier (e.g. the Ferrari 360 is only in one place and you easily see what the MR-02 offset is).
-hobbycar
|
Thanks. That is the main reason why I made that revision. Less clutter and easier to find what you need to know.
|
|
|
2006.03.11, 02:38 PM
|
#11
|
Mini-Z Magician
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Manhattan/StatenIsland NY
Posts: 154
|
|
|
|
2006.04.05, 11:24 PM
|
#12
|
How're YOU doin?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington state
Posts: 1,075
|
Unless I'm missunderstanding the chart, the 2004 350Z JGTC cars (Calsonic and Motul Pitworks) have an offset of 1. According to my autoscale manuals anyway...
Infact my Kyosho NSX alloy wheels (which I'm assuming are 0) are too narrow for the 350z bodies. They do however fit the 360GTC fairly well even though that body has an offset of 1, and they fit the mclaren fine which has an offset of 0. So maybe the 350Zs are 1w?
Last edited by bolter9; 2006.04.05 at 11:27 PM.
|
|
|
2006.04.05, 11:42 PM
|
#13
|
EMUracing
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,417
|
Yes you are right, I need to update that. I noticed that when I got my Calsonic 350z. I believe that the Hasemi has a 0n/0w offset while the Calsonic/Motul has 1n/1w. I have 2.5n/2w on my Calsonic AWD setup. I was running it on an 02 with 1n/3w Enzo wheels last week, and the rear wheels did not protrude from the wheel well, although in turns the rears would rub on the top of the wheel wells since there isnt too much space for the articulation.
Last edited by EMU; 2006.04.05 at 11:50 PM.
|
|
|
2006.04.06, 01:20 AM
|
#14
|
How're YOU doin?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington state
Posts: 1,075
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EMU
Yes you are right, I need to update that. I noticed that when I got my Calsonic 350z. I believe that the Hasemi has a 0n/0w offset while the Calsonic/Motul has 1n/1w. I have 2.5n/2w on my Calsonic AWD setup. I was running it on an 02 with 1n/3w Enzo wheels last week, and the rear wheels did not protrude from the wheel well, although in turns the rears would rub on the top of the wheel wells since there isnt too much space for the articulation.
|
Yeah the Hasemi doesn't have the newer wide body. I've been trying to find a set of alloys that will fit the 350z JGTC cars (MR02), but it seems like everything here at the shop is the wrong offset.
|
|
|
2006.04.06, 01:52 AM
|
#15
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stafford, Va
Posts: 6,064
|
EMU if there are any more changes just post the new file here and I'll replace it for ya.
-Byebye
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.
|
|